Measure your canthal tilt in seconds: upload a front-facing photo and this calculator reads each eye separately — left angle, right angle, the average, and the difference between them — entirely on your device. Community reference band: +4° to +8° positive tilt.
🔒 Free measuring runs on your device; the AI readout can optionally attach your photo — generation-only, never stored.
Canthal tilt is the angle of the line between your eye's inner corner (medial canthus, near the nose) and outer corner (lateral canthus, toward the temple):
The measurement itself is plain geometry: the 478-landmark model finds both eye corners, corrects for head roll using your facial midline, and reports each eye's angle in degrees. The same photo, read again, gives the same degrees — nothing here is estimated.
One honest caveat: there is no scientifically established "perfect" angle. The +4° to +8° band is a community convention, not a law. Qoves Studio's measured "attractive range" runs wider (roughly +5.7° to +10.3°), published anthropometric norms cluster in the low positive degrees, and no controlled study crowns a single ideal. Treat the band as a reference grid, not a verdict.
| Reading | What it is | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| Left eye tilt | Your left eye's angle in degrees | Each eye is measured independently |
| Right eye tilt | Your right eye's angle in degrees | Small differences between eyes are normal |
| Canthal tilt (average) | Both eyes averaged — the number the full engine scores | +4° to +8° is the community reference band |
| Left / right difference | The gap between your two eyes | Almost everyone has some asymmetry; a few degrees is unremarkable |
| Eye aspect (h/w) | Eye height ÷ eye width | Lower reads narrower — the "narrow opening" part of the hunter-eyes bundle |
Why show each eye separately? Because two eyes on the same face rarely agree — and a single averaged number hides that. The left/right difference is normal anatomy, not an error in your photo.
| Your reading | What it means |
|---|---|
| +8° and above | Strongly upturned — uncommon naturally; beyond a point, further elevation doesn't raise ratings |
| +4° to +8° | Community reference band |
| +2° to +4° | Slightly upturned — inside the measured "attractive range" territory |
| 0° to +2° | Approximately level — balanced, natural |
| −3° to 0° | Slightly downturned |
| Below −3° | Downturned — "prey eyes" in community vocabulary |
Two things the table cannot say: first, tilt is one input among many — it carries 15% of the weight in the full rating engine, and conventionally attractive faces exist at every band. Second, attractiveness research finds substantial subjectivity; the community bands are conventions, not measurements of worth.
Preparing the example study — it measures itself as you reach it…
The tilt line is short, so small photo flaws move it more than any other reading:
Measure something else:
Read next:
Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994 — palpebral fissure inclination norms: measured eye-corner angles cluster in the low positive degrees, with systematic left/right asymmetry documented as normal.
Qoves Studio. Canthal tilt — measurement insights. qoves.com/insights/measurements/canthal-tilt — the measured "attractive range" (≈ +5.7° to +10.3°) cited above.
Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006;57:199–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 — averageness, symmetry and dimorphism carry attractiveness; single-ratio "ideals" do not.
One photo, on your device, no sign-up — left angle, right angle, average and difference, roll-corrected.
Run the free calculator